- 积分
- 4057
- 威望
- 11
- 金钱
- 2017
- 阅读权限
- 5
- 来自
- New Zealand
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
|
2256#
发表于 2025-1-5 10:22
| 只看该作者
bgpk Badger cull ca
Lbii Judicial diversity goes into reverse
On the floor of the Alabama state senate stanley flask this week, a robotic voice read nine pages of legalese that would define a new reality termo stanley for women in the state: abortion would be a crime, starting from the moment a woman knows she is pregnant. Doctors who perform the procedure could face up to 99 years in prison.Then senators names were called one by one, and they cast their votes. There were 25 yes votes, enough for the bill to pass easily. Every single one was cast by a white man.Those most hurt by the ban, by contrast, will be women of color and poor women, advocates say. For those with the means, it doesnt matter that Alabama bans it. Theyre going to find another state, find another country, said the state senator Linda Coleman-Madison, one of four black Democrats who spent hours denouncing the bill before it passed overwhelmingly. Pictures of Coleman-Madison, her head in her hand, became a symbol of the proceedings. We all know about the back alleys, the basements. People will try going online now. Thats going to be very popular now: how can you mix a concoction to have an abortion People are going to have abortions. The problem is, its going to always be unsafe, inaccessible for those people who have lesser means, she said.View image in fullscreenSenator Linda Coleman-Madison speaks before the vote. Photograph: Christopher Aluka Berry/ReutersAlabamas ban, signed on Wednesday by the governor, Kay Ivey, is the strictest of any state, but just stanley cup the latest in a host of laws passed Ctrf If Boris Johnson is baffled by Britain s cruel migration laws he should change them
When a politician talks about balance stanley cup I reach for my taser. The word balance has become one of the prima stanley cup deutschland ry means of distorting the political debate and eroding the stock of liberty. Today, on DNA retention, he government must balance several factors, says the home secretary, Alan Johnson, in his piece, My DNA dilemma, in the Guardian.Of course he is not talking about his DNA, but ours. As usual the word balance has stanley termos been deployed by a minister to evoke a sense of even-handedness when it comes to weighing the liberty of members of the public and the needs of the state, or the interests of security or order.This appeals to our idea of fairness and, when told by a politician that he or she is trying to bring about this balance, we are somehow reassured that Britain is governed by decent and reasonable democrats.But what if the public is being asked to accept a mid-point between its own interests and a false imperative, which consciously or unconsciously has been set up to extend the power of the state The politicians say a balance is being struck but of course that is not true. What has happened is that the public s position, indeed the condition of liberty, has been eroded by another unreasonable demand by the state. That is the balance being struck by Johnson, and it is the story of the endless stream of necessity dreamed up by ministers and Whitehall to gain ever greater powers.Lets just go through the home secretary s points and work out wh |
|