|
 
- 积分
- 1865
- 威望
- 722
- 金钱
- 2
- 阅读权限
- 70
- 性别
- 男
- 来自
- china
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
|
167#
发表于 2004-2-20 10:50
| 只看该作者
Originally posted by jiejiedog at 2004-2-19 15:33:
从长远角度来说，中国肯定是美国的遏制对象，这大家都知道。...
不光是长远角度的问题,也未必大家都知道.
过去美国奉行的不是遏制中国的政策么? 朝鲜战争不是遏制的一种方式么?
向台湾省出售武器不是遏制么?<与台湾关系法>针对的是外星人么?
说到现在, 欧盟提议解除对华军售, 美国又是抗议又是阻挠, 这也不是遏制么?
上面是我们看到的现象,美国人自己怎么说的呢? 我引一段美国的图书广告, 作者不是一般的老百姓,而是能够影响美国政策的政界人士. Richard Perle是美国防务问题专家, David Frum曾任小布什的文胆(演讲词撰写人)"邪恶轴心"一词乃此公首创. 文章最后一段是<华盛顿邮报>对Richard Perle的吹捧, 遭个报纸好象也不是街头小报.
作者认为美国绝不能现在就停止反恐战争, 嘿嘿, 阿富汗打垮了, 伊拉克也占领了, 下一个是谁呢?
我提请各位注意划线的句子. 作者说:"美国还谈不上脱离危险:伊斯兰恐怖主义远未结束,北韩危机还在继续,中国仍然怀有的侵略野心不仅危胁到台湾,也危胁到美国.America is by no means out of danger: the threat of Islamic terrorism is far from ended, the crisis with North Korea continues, and China still harbors aggressive ambitions that threaten not only Taiwan, but the United States" 翻的不太通顺,望高手斧正.
这里的话语还有什么不明确的吗?
中国能够危胁到美国吗? -------------"欲加之罪,何患无词!"
注意该书的题目<终止邪恶:如何打赢反恐战争>.
附原文, 参见
http://www.nrbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6425
From David Frum and Richard Perle: How to conquer complacency and defeatism - and recover the will to win the war on terror
Printer Friendly Version
What must we do to make the world safe again -- to defend Americans at home and abroad? An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terrorism gives you the answer from two shrewd and informed Washington insiders: David Frum, former speechwriter for President Bush and bestselling author of The Right Man, and Richard Perle, the former assistant secretary of defense and one of the most influential and respected foreign policy leaders in Washington.
Frum and Perle are unafraid to speak forthrightly about troubling signs that important sectors of the government -- including figures at the highest levels of the Bush administration -- are getting cold feet about continuing on to victory in the war on terror. They detail how the pressure to end anti-terror efforts is now coming from all sides: from a military whose leaders are suspicious of the changes that are necessary to confront properly the changing global situation; from intelligence agencies hopelessly mired in bureaucracy; and from politically correct American diplomats who value dinner and drinks with their foreign colleagues more highly than the national security interests of their own country.
An End to Evil also makes it clear that ending the war on terror now would be an unmitigated disaster for our nation. Frum and Perle provide a detailed, candid account of America's continuing vulnerabilities. They provide trenchantly presented and persuasive evidence that despite victories in Afghanistan and Iraq, America is by no means out of danger: the threat of Islamic terrorism is far from ended, the crisis with North Korea continues, and China still harbors aggressive ambitions that threaten not only Taiwan, but the United States.
Perle and Frum also include a bold, practical program to defend America and to achieve final and decisive victory in the war on terror. Here is a blueprint for Washington policy makers, as well as an enlightening series of insights for every patriotic citizen into the threats facing America today and how we must meet them. An End to Evil will define the conservative point of view on foreign policy for a new generation -- and shape the agenda for the 2004 election and beyond. Frum and Perle reveal:
* Why submitting to the authority of the United Nations could result in serious increases in threats to our national security
* France and Saudi Arabia: allies or adversaries? Why it would be prudent for the United States to treat these nations as rivals and perhaps even enemies in the war on terror
* Why the United States must take decisive action to support the overthrow of the terrorist mullahs of Iran -- now, before it's too late
* The terrorist regime of Syria: what America's posture toward it should be
* How the CIA and FBI have completely bungled counter-terrorism initiatives thus far -- and why both organizations need to be radically reorganized in order to face the terrorist threat effectively
* The roots of Muslim rage: why they're not to be found in U.S. policies toward the Middle East, but in Islam itself
* Bill Clinton: how his administration piled restrictions on the CIA and FBI that hamstrung their anti-terror efforts -- contrary to his recent claims to have been obsessed with the terrorist threat
* How Clinton and a whole panoply of weak-willed leaders who couldn't muster the nerve for decisive action doomed our anti-terrorism efforts of the 1990s to failure
* The Israeli-Arab dispute: why virtually everything you read about it in the newspapers is dead wrong
* How fears of renewed "McCarthyism" have hampered our efforts to combat Islamic terrorism
* The strange alliance that has sprung up since 9/11 between the CIA and the Syrian secret service
* Mike Hawash: the strange case of this "average American" who sided with Islamic terrorists, and the lessons it teaches us about what we must do to win the war on terror
* Why the CIA insisted for years that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden detested each other and would never work together -- despite steadily growing evidence to the contrary
* The State Department: how it cunningly manipulates foreign policy, often at cross purposes with the wishes of the President
* The crackdown on terror-supporting Islamic charities: why it is a good move, but it isn't enough
* How the "experts" on Iran have allowed their ideology to run roughshod over the facts, thereby endangering all Americans
* The astonishing extent to which extremist attitudes are found even among American Muslims -- and the hard steps we must take to combat them
* Why we must abandon the illusion that a Palestinian state will contribute in any important way to American security
* Why we must tighten immigration controls and security at home, and how we can accomplish these tasks now
* The hysteria over the Patriot Act: why it is largely baseless
* North Korea: what America must do if negotiations fail
* The next great terror threat: where it will come from, and what we must do to protect ourselves
* Why, despite the seriousness of the terrorist threat, the United States may be a tougher target than it seems to be
"A not completely crazy case can be made that the most influential thinker in the foreign-policy apparatus of the Administration of George W. Bush during its first two years was not one of the familiar members of the gold-shielded Praetorian Guard -- not Dick Cheney or Colin Powell, not Condi or Rummy, not Tenet or Wolfowitz -- but, rather, a forty-two-year-old Canadian named David Frum." -- Hendrik Hertzberg, The New Yorker
"[Richard Perle is the] intellectual guru of the hard-line neoconservative movement in foreign policy. . . . [He] has profound influence over Bush policies and officials in the competition for the hearts of the president and his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice." -- Dana Milbank, Washington Post
[ Last edited by idiotor on 2004-2-20 at 13:07 ] |
|
