Board logo

标题: 美部分州提出维护本州主权决议zt [打印本页]

作者: whisper    时间: 2009-4-1 12:08     标题: 美部分州提出维护本州主权决议zt

http://www.voanews.com/chinese/w2009-03-30-voa51.cfm

美部分州提出维护本州主权决议
记者: 安华
华盛顿
Mar 30, 2009

美国28个州的立法机构提出维护本州主权的决议,做出这些举措的部分原因是为了回应联邦刺激经济基金的附加条件,还有部分原因要归于美国的建国历史。

这些决议案目前在两个州被否决,在4个州获得通过,其中包括爱达荷州、南卡罗莱纳州、南达科他州以及俄克拉荷马州。

在南卡罗来纳州有一个流传很久的笑话:话说当年,美国内战时期南方邦联的总统杰弗逊·戴维斯1865年在南卡罗莱纳州阿比维尔投降,但是州众议员迈克尔·皮茨选区的民众却从来没有向联邦投降。

美国28个州的“主权法案”当中,甚至有法案提出,如果华盛顿再不约束自己对各州发号施令的行为,美国就应该彻底解体。作为这些法案之一的起草者,皮茨众议员站在了维护州权力运动的前线。这些人认为在从干细胞研究到规定个人拥有枪支的宪法第二修正案等所有存在争议的问题上,各州都有自己的发言权。

其实,反对联邦拥有过大权力的势头,早在布什总统时期就已经开始,比如当年加州就坚定维护自己在枪支管治、医用大麻等问题上的权利和立场,但是现在这种势头有愈演愈烈之势。

从南卡罗莱纳州到新罕布什尔州,从华盛顿州到俄克拉荷马州,各州都试图阻挠奥巴马总统在全国推行变革的雄心壮志。他们为这场政治对峙找出了理论依据,那就是美国宪法第十修正案,该修正案规定:所有权力归于人民,而不是华盛顿的官员。

过去,不管是自由派还是保守派人士都利用维护州权的名义来为自己谋取政治私利。但是现在失去华盛顿执政地位的保守派人士,正在试图把这些争议问题从华盛顿挪到各个州,因为在各州层面,保守派人士在这些问题上的胜算更大。

关键词:美国,自由派,保守派,州主权
作者: whisper    时间: 2009-4-1 12:09

==========================
美国28个州的“主权法案”当中,甚至有法案提出,如果华盛顿再不约束自己对各州发号施令的行为,美国就应该彻底解体。
==========================
如果这个能够成为事实,我就坚决拥护各位所说的“民主”。不管是谁说的。
作者: insectide    时间: 2009-4-1 12:24

本帖最后由 insectide 于 2009-4-1 12:32 编辑

这些人有没有被扣上美奸的帽子批斗啊?这本身就是民主的体现。
作者: whisper    时间: 2009-4-1 16:28

美国逮捕了四名“企图推翻政府”的反政府团体成员
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,506746,00.html
Members of Anti-Government Group Arrested in Las Vegas
Saturday, March 07, 2009  


Print ShareThisLAS VEGAS —  Four members of an anti-government group have been arrested on charges that include money laundering, tax evasion and weapons possession, federal prosecutors said Friday.

Authorities said the four men are members of the Sovereign Movement, a group that attempts to overthrow the government and defy authority with "paper terrorism." The arrests in Las Vegas on Thursday capped a three-year investigation into the group's activities led by the Nevada Joint Terrorism Task Force, U.S. Attorney for Nevada Greg Brower said.

A grand jury indictment in federal court in Las Vegas names Samuel Davis, 54, of Council, Idaho; Shawn Rice, 46, of Seligman, Arizona; Harold Call, 67, of Las Vegas; and Jan Lindsey, of Henderson, Nevada.

Davis and Rice are accused of laundering roughly $1.3 million for undercover FBI agents, who described the money as loot from a bank fraud scheme. Davis and Rice are charged with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering and 30 counts of money laundering. If convicted, they face up to 20 years in prison and a $500,000 fine on each count.

Davis was described by prosecutors as a national leader in the Sovereign Movement, whose members believe government licenses, taxes and currency are invalid. Rice described himself as a lawyer and rabbi devoted to anti-government teaching, authorities said.

Davis and Rice pleaded not guilty in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas late Friday. Call and Lindsey also were due to appear in court. Authorities did not know if the four had lawyers.

Brower's office said Call and Lindsey, a retired FBI agent, are leaders of the Nevada Lawmen Group for Public Awareness, a group affiliated with the Sovereign Movement.

Call is accused of possessing an unregistered machine gun, as well as parts designed to convert manual firearms into automatic weapons.

He faces two counts of possession and transfer of a machine gun and three counts of possession of an unregistered machine gun. If convicted, he could get up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count.

Lindsey is charged with one count of evasion of payment of tax and four counts of evasion of assessment of tax. He faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count.
作者: insectide    时间: 2009-4-1 16:42

本帖最后由 insectide 于 2009-4-1 16:43 编辑
美国逮捕了四名“企图推翻政府”的反政府团体成员
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,506746,00.html
Members of Anti-Government Group Arrested in Las Vegas
Saturday, March 07, 2009  


Print ShareT ...
whisper 发表于 2009-4-1 16:28

武力推翻民选证府和恐怖活动有什麽区别?某些人是不是不能区分和平和暴力?要不转这个帖子能说明什麽?
作者: akama    时间: 2009-4-1 17:06

武力推翻民选证府和恐怖活动有什麽区别?某些人是不是不能区分和平和暴力?要不转这个帖子能说明什麽?
insectide 发表于 2009-4-1 16:42

哪句话提到武力推翻?最多非法持有武器罢了
作者: 乌乌爱装嫩    时间: 2009-4-1 17:43

武力推翻民选证府和恐怖活动有什麽区别?某些人是不是不能区分和平和暴力?要不转这个帖子能说明什麽?
insectide 发表于 2009-4-1 16:42


某些狗真是见不得自己主子受委屈啊,叫得那叫一个响
作者: insectide    时间: 2009-4-1 19:00

哪句话提到武力推翻?最多非法持有武器罢了
akama 发表于 2009-4-1 17:06


人家逮捕的理由难道不是各项违法行为吗?难道是别人“图谋推翻政府的构想”?况且这只是逮捕,并没有定罪,后者是法庭的事。
作者: insectide    时间: 2009-4-1 19:02

某些狗真是见不得自己主子受委屈啊,叫得那叫一个响
乌乌爱装嫩 发表于 2009-4-1 17:43

某些人就是千方百计抹黑别人,让人觉着天下乌鸦一般黑,然后就可以让本国民众甘心接受不公平的待遇。
作者: akama    时间: 2009-4-1 19:23

人家逮捕的理由难道不是各项违法行为吗?难道是别人“图谋推翻政府的构想”?况且这只是逮捕,并没有定罪,后者是法庭的事。
insectide 发表于 2009-4-1 19:00

所以你在5楼的论调因何而发?




欢迎光临 人在德国 社区 (http://csuchen.de/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2